0.11/0.13 % Problem : Vampire---4.8_9091 : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.11/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 1440 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 180 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Jul 3 13:10:16 EDT 2023 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime : 0.21/0.48 Running higher-order theorem provingRunning: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.CZ7OFBhhVK/Vampire---4.8_9091 0.21/0.48 # Version: 3.1pre001-ho 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLLNHSN. 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 900s (5) cores 0.21/0.51 # Starting post_as_ho3 with 180s (1) cores 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_ho_12 with 180s (1) cores 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_bool_2 with 180s (1) cores 0.21/0.51 # new_ho_10_cnf2 with pid 9269 completed with status 0 0.21/0.51 # Result found by new_ho_10_cnf2 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLLNHSN. 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 900s (5) cores 0.21/0.51 # No SInE strategy applied 0.21/0.51 # Search class: HGHNF-FFMF21-SHSSMSBN 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total) 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_ho_9 with 487s (1) cores 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 91s (1) cores 0.21/0.51 # Starting pre_casc_8 with 82s (1) cores 0.21/0.51 # Starting post_as_ho2 with 82s (1) cores 0.21/0.51 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 82s (1) cores 0.21/0.51 # post_as_ho1 with pid 9279 completed with status 0 0.21/0.51 # Result found by post_as_ho1 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSMLLNHSN. 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 900s (5) cores 0.21/0.51 # No SInE strategy applied 0.21/0.51 # Search class: HGHNF-FFMF21-SHSSMSBN 0.21/0.51 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total) 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_ho_9 with 487s (1) cores 0.21/0.51 # Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 91s (1) cores 0.21/0.51 # Starting pre_casc_8 with 82s (1) cores 0.21/0.51 # Starting post_as_ho2 with 82s (1) cores 0.21/0.51 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 82s (1) cores 0.21/0.51 # Preprocessing time : 0.004 s 0.21/0.51 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.21/0.51 0.21/0.51 # Proof found! 0.21/0.51 # SZS status Theorem 0.21/0.51 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.21/0.51 thf(decl_37, type, mbox: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $o) > $i > $o). 0.21/0.51 thf(decl_49, type, mvalid: ($i > $o) > $o). 0.21/0.51 thf(decl_53, type, c: reg > reg > $o). 0.21/0.51 thf(decl_55, type, p: reg > reg > $o). 0.21/0.51 thf(decl_56, type, eq: reg > reg > $o). 0.21/0.51 thf(decl_57, type, o: reg > reg > $o). 0.21/0.51 thf(decl_59, type, ec: reg > reg > $o). 0.21/0.51 thf(decl_60, type, pp: reg > reg > $o). 0.21/0.51 thf(decl_62, type, ntpp: reg > reg > $o). 0.21/0.51 thf(decl_64, type, france: reg). 0.21/0.51 thf(decl_66, type, paris: reg). 0.21/0.51 thf(decl_67, type, a: $i > $i > $o). 0.21/0.51 thf(decl_69, type, esk1_0: reg). 0.21/0.51 thf(decl_70, type, esk2_1: reg > reg). 0.21/0.51 thf(decl_71, type, esk3_1: reg > reg). 0.21/0.51 thf(decl_83, type, esk15_0: $i). 0.21/0.51 thf(decl_84, type, esk16_0: $i). 0.21/0.51 thf(decl_85, type, esk17_2: reg > reg > reg). 0.21/0.51 thf(decl_86, type, esk18_2: reg > reg > reg). 0.21/0.51 thf(o, axiom, ((o)=(^[X25:reg, X26:reg]:(?[X22:reg]:(((p @ X22 @ X25)&(p @ X22 @ X26)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.CZ7OFBhhVK/Vampire---4.8_9091', o)). 0.21/0.51 thf(p, axiom, ((p)=(^[X20:reg, X21:reg]:(![X22:reg]:(((c @ X22 @ X20)=>(c @ X22 @ X21)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.CZ7OFBhhVK/Vampire---4.8_9091', p)). 0.21/0.51 thf(ec, axiom, ((ec)=(^[X29:reg, X30:reg]:(((c @ X29 @ X30)&~((o @ X29 @ X30)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.CZ7OFBhhVK/Vampire---4.8_9091', ec)). 0.21/0.51 thf(pp, axiom, ((pp)=(^[X31:reg, X32:reg]:(((p @ X31 @ X32)&~((p @ X32 @ X31)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.CZ7OFBhhVK/Vampire---4.8_9091', pp)). 0.21/0.51 thf(ntpp, axiom, ((ntpp)=(^[X35:reg, X36:reg]:(((pp @ X35 @ X36)&~(?[X22:reg]:(((ec @ X22 @ X35)&(ec @ X22 @ X36)))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.CZ7OFBhhVK/Vampire---4.8_9091', ntpp)). 0.21/0.51 thf(eq, axiom, ((eq)=(^[X23:reg, X24:reg]:(((p @ X23 @ X24)&(p @ X24 @ X23))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.CZ7OFBhhVK/Vampire---4.8_9091', eq)). 0.21/0.51 thf(mbox, axiom, ((mbox)=(^[X13:$i > $i > $o, X6:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(![X14:$i]:((~((X13 @ X3 @ X14))|(X6 @ X14)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.CZ7OFBhhVK/Vampire---4.8_9091', mbox)). 0.21/0.51 thf(mvalid, axiom, ((mvalid)=(^[X6:$i > $o]:(![X3:$i]:((X6 @ X3))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.CZ7OFBhhVK/Vampire---4.8_9091', mvalid)). 0.21/0.51 thf(ax3, axiom, (mvalid @ (mbox @ a @ (^[X40:$i]:((ntpp @ paris @ france))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.CZ7OFBhhVK/Vampire---4.8_9091', ax3)). 0.21/0.51 thf(con, conjecture, (mvalid @ (mbox @ a @ (^[X44:$i]:(?[X22:reg, X45:reg]:((((p @ X22 @ france)&(p @ X45 @ france))&~((eq @ X22 @ X45)))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.CZ7OFBhhVK/Vampire---4.8_9091', con)). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_10, plain, ((o)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(?[X22:reg]:(((![X54:reg]:(((c @ X54 @ X22)=>(c @ X54 @ Z0))))&(![X55:reg]:(((c @ X55 @ X22)=>(c @ X55 @ Z1))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[o])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_11, plain, ((p)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(![X22:reg]:(((c @ X22 @ Z0)=>(c @ X22 @ Z1)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[p])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_12, plain, ((ec)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(((c @ Z0 @ Z1)&~((?[X61:reg]:(((![X62:reg]:(((c @ X62 @ X61)=>(c @ X62 @ Z0))))&(![X63:reg]:(((c @ X63 @ X61)=>(c @ X63 @ Z1)))))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ec])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_13, plain, ((o)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(?[X22:reg]:(((![X54:reg]:(((c @ X54 @ X22)=>(c @ X54 @ Z0))))&(![X55:reg]:(((c @ X55 @ X22)=>(c @ X55 @ Z1))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_14, plain, ((pp)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(((![X64:reg]:(((c @ X64 @ Z0)=>(c @ X64 @ Z1))))&~((![X65:reg]:(((c @ X65 @ Z1)=>(c @ X65 @ Z0))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[pp])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_15, plain, ((ntpp)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(((((![X74:reg]:(((c @ X74 @ Z0)=>(c @ X74 @ Z1))))&~((![X75:reg]:(((c @ X75 @ Z1)=>(c @ X75 @ Z0)))))))&~(?[X22:reg]:(((((c @ X22 @ Z0)&~((?[X76:reg]:(((![X77:reg]:(((c @ X77 @ X76)=>(c @ X77 @ X22))))&(![X78:reg]:(((c @ X78 @ X76)=>(c @ X78 @ Z0))))))))))&(((c @ X22 @ Z1)&~((?[X79:reg]:(((![X80:reg]:(((c @ X80 @ X79)=>(c @ X80 @ X22))))&(![X81:reg]:(((c @ X81 @ X79)=>(c @ X81 @ Z1))))))))))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ntpp])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_16, plain, ((ec)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(((c @ Z0 @ Z1)&~((?[X61:reg]:(((![X62:reg]:(((c @ X62 @ X61)=>(c @ X62 @ Z0))))&(![X63:reg]:(((c @ X63 @ X61)=>(c @ X63 @ Z1)))))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_17, plain, ((pp)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(((![X64:reg]:(((c @ X64 @ Z0)=>(c @ X64 @ Z1))))&~((![X65:reg]:(((c @ X65 @ Z1)=>(c @ X65 @ Z0))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_11])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_18, plain, ((eq)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(((![X52:reg]:(((c @ X52 @ Z0)=>(c @ X52 @ Z1))))&(![X53:reg]:(((c @ X53 @ Z1)=>(c @ X53 @ Z0)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[eq])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_19, plain, ((mbox)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:$i > $i > $o, Z1:$i > $o, Z2:$i]:(![X14:$i]:((~((Z0 @ Z2 @ X14))|(Z1 @ X14)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mbox])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_20, plain, ((mvalid)=(^[Z0/* 6 */:$i > $o]:(![X3:$i]:((Z0 @ X3))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mvalid])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_21, plain, ((ntpp)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(((((![X74:reg]:(((c @ X74 @ Z0)=>(c @ X74 @ Z1))))&~((![X75:reg]:(((c @ X75 @ Z1)=>(c @ X75 @ Z0)))))))&~(?[X22:reg]:(((((c @ X22 @ Z0)&~((?[X76:reg]:(((![X77:reg]:(((c @ X77 @ X76)=>(c @ X77 @ X22))))&(![X78:reg]:(((c @ X78 @ X76)=>(c @ X78 @ Z0))))))))))&(((c @ X22 @ Z1)&~((?[X79:reg]:(((![X80:reg]:(((c @ X80 @ X79)=>(c @ X80 @ X22))))&(![X81:reg]:(((c @ X81 @ X79)=>(c @ X81 @ Z1))))))))))))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16]), c_0_17])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_22, plain, ((eq)=(^[Z0/* 19 */:reg, Z1:reg]:(((![X52:reg]:(((c @ X52 @ Z0)=>(c @ X52 @ Z1))))&(![X53:reg]:(((c @ X53 @ Z1)=>(c @ X53 @ Z0)))))))), inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_11])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_23, plain, ![X92:$i, X91:$i]:((~(a @ X92 @ X91)|((![X82:reg]:(((c @ X82 @ paris)=>(c @ X82 @ france)))&~(![X83:reg]:(((c @ X83 @ france)=>(c @ X83 @ paris)))))&~(?[X84:reg]:((((c @ X84 @ paris)&~(?[X85:reg]:((![X86:reg]:(((c @ X86 @ X85)=>(c @ X86 @ X84)))&![X87:reg]:(((c @ X87 @ X85)=>(c @ X87 @ paris)))))))&((c @ X84 @ france)&~(?[X88:reg]:((![X89:reg]:(((c @ X89 @ X88)=>(c @ X89 @ X84)))&![X90:reg]:(((c @ X90 @ X88)=>(c @ X90 @ france))))))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax3]), c_0_19]), c_0_20]), c_0_21])])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, ~(![X126:$i, X125:$i]:((~(a @ X126 @ X125)|?[X22:reg, X45:reg]:(((![X121:reg]:(((c @ X121 @ X22)=>(c @ X121 @ france)))&![X122:reg]:(((c @ X122 @ X45)=>(c @ X122 @ france))))&~((![X123:reg]:(((c @ X123 @ X22)=>(c @ X123 @ X45)))&![X124:reg]:(((c @ X124 @ X45)=>(c @ X124 @ X22)))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])]), c_0_19]), c_0_20]), c_0_11]), c_0_22])])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_25, plain, ![X130:$i, X131:$i, X132:reg, X134:reg, X136:reg, X137:reg, X139:reg, X140:reg]:((((~(c @ X132 @ paris)|(c @ X132 @ france)|~(a @ X130 @ X131))&(((c @ esk1_0 @ france)|~(a @ X130 @ X131))&(~(c @ esk1_0 @ paris)|~(a @ X130 @ X131))))&(((~(c @ X139 @ (esk3_1 @ X134))|(c @ X139 @ X134)|~(c @ X134 @ france)|(~(c @ X136 @ (esk2_1 @ X134))|(c @ X136 @ X134)|~(c @ X134 @ paris))|~(a @ X130 @ X131))&(~(c @ X140 @ (esk3_1 @ X134))|(c @ X140 @ france)|~(c @ X134 @ france)|(~(c @ X136 @ (esk2_1 @ X134))|(c @ X136 @ X134)|~(c @ X134 @ paris))|~(a @ X130 @ X131)))&((~(c @ X139 @ (esk3_1 @ X134))|(c @ X139 @ X134)|~(c @ X134 @ france)|(~(c @ X137 @ (esk2_1 @ X134))|(c @ X137 @ paris)|~(c @ X134 @ paris))|~(a @ X130 @ X131))&(~(c @ X140 @ (esk3_1 @ X134))|(c @ X140 @ france)|~(c @ X134 @ france)|(~(c @ X137 @ (esk2_1 @ X134))|(c @ X137 @ paris)|~(c @ X134 @ paris))|~(a @ X130 @ X131)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])])])])])])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, ![X171:reg, X172:reg, X175:reg, X176:reg]:(((a @ esk15_0 @ esk16_0)&((((~(c @ X175 @ X171)|(c @ X175 @ X172)|((c @ (esk18_2 @ X171 @ X172) @ X172)|(c @ (esk17_2 @ X171 @ X172) @ X171)))&(~(c @ X176 @ X172)|(c @ X176 @ X171)|((c @ (esk18_2 @ X171 @ X172) @ X172)|(c @ (esk17_2 @ X171 @ X172) @ X171))))&((~(c @ X175 @ X171)|(c @ X175 @ X172)|(~(c @ (esk18_2 @ X171 @ X172) @ france)|(c @ (esk17_2 @ X171 @ X172) @ X171)))&(~(c @ X176 @ X172)|(c @ X176 @ X171)|(~(c @ (esk18_2 @ X171 @ X172) @ france)|(c @ (esk17_2 @ X171 @ X172) @ X171)))))&(((~(c @ X175 @ X171)|(c @ X175 @ X172)|((c @ (esk18_2 @ X171 @ X172) @ X172)|~(c @ (esk17_2 @ X171 @ X172) @ france)))&(~(c @ X176 @ X172)|(c @ X176 @ X171)|((c @ (esk18_2 @ X171 @ X172) @ X172)|~(c @ (esk17_2 @ X171 @ X172) @ france))))&((~(c @ X175 @ X171)|(c @ X175 @ X172)|(~(c @ (esk18_2 @ X171 @ X172) @ france)|~(c @ (esk17_2 @ X171 @ X172) @ france)))&(~(c @ X176 @ X172)|(c @ X176 @ X171)|(~(c @ (esk18_2 @ X171 @ X172) @ france)|~(c @ (esk17_2 @ X171 @ X172) @ france)))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_24])])])])])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_27, plain, ![X3:$i, X14:$i]:(((c @ esk1_0 @ france)|~((a @ X3 @ X14)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_28, negated_conjecture, (a @ esk15_0 @ esk16_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_29, negated_conjecture, ![X18:reg, X20:reg, X19:reg]:(((c @ X18 @ X20)|(c @ (esk18_2 @ X19 @ X20) @ X20)|(c @ (esk17_2 @ X19 @ X20) @ X19)|~((c @ X18 @ X19)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_30, negated_conjecture, (c @ esk1_0 @ france), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_28])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_31, plain, ![X3:$i, X14:$i]:((~((c @ esk1_0 @ paris))|~((a @ X3 @ X14)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_32, plain, ![X18:reg, X3:$i, X14:$i]:(((c @ X18 @ france)|~((c @ X18 @ paris))|~((a @ X3 @ X14)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_33, negated_conjecture, ![X18:reg]:(((c @ (esk17_2 @ france @ X18) @ france)|(c @ (esk18_2 @ france @ X18) @ X18)|(c @ esk1_0 @ X18))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29, c_0_30])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_34, negated_conjecture, ~((c @ esk1_0 @ paris)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31, c_0_28])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_35, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$i, X14:$i]:(((c @ (esk17_2 @ france @ paris) @ france)|(c @ (esk18_2 @ france @ paris) @ france)|~((a @ X3 @ X14)))), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32, c_0_33]), c_0_34])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_36, negated_conjecture, ![X18:reg, X19:reg, X20:reg]:(((c @ X18 @ X20)|(c @ (esk17_2 @ X19 @ X20) @ X19)|~((c @ X18 @ X19))|~((c @ (esk18_2 @ X19 @ X20) @ france)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_37, negated_conjecture, ((c @ (esk18_2 @ france @ paris) @ france)|(c @ (esk17_2 @ france @ paris) @ france)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35, c_0_28])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_38, negated_conjecture, ![X18:reg]:(((c @ (esk17_2 @ france @ paris) @ france)|(c @ X18 @ paris)|~((c @ X18 @ france)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36, c_0_37])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_39, negated_conjecture, ![X18:reg, X19:reg, X20:reg]:(((c @ X18 @ X20)|(c @ (esk18_2 @ X19 @ X20) @ X20)|~((c @ X18 @ X19))|~((c @ (esk17_2 @ X19 @ X20) @ france)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_40, negated_conjecture, (c @ (esk17_2 @ france @ paris) @ france), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38, c_0_30]), c_0_34])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_41, negated_conjecture, ![X18:reg]:(((c @ (esk18_2 @ france @ paris) @ paris)|(c @ X18 @ paris)|~((c @ X18 @ france)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39, c_0_40])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_42, negated_conjecture, (c @ (esk18_2 @ france @ paris) @ paris), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41, c_0_30]), c_0_34])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_43, negated_conjecture, ![X18:reg, X19:reg, X20:reg]:(((c @ X18 @ X20)|~((c @ X18 @ X19))|~((c @ (esk18_2 @ X19 @ X20) @ france))|~((c @ (esk17_2 @ X19 @ X20) @ france)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_44, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$i, X14:$i]:(((c @ (esk18_2 @ france @ paris) @ france)|~((a @ X3 @ X14)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32, c_0_42])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_45, negated_conjecture, ![X18:reg]:(((c @ X18 @ paris)|~((c @ (esk18_2 @ france @ paris) @ france))|~((c @ X18 @ france)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43, c_0_40])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_46, negated_conjecture, (c @ (esk18_2 @ france @ paris) @ france), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44, c_0_28])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_47, negated_conjecture, ![X18:reg]:(((c @ X18 @ paris)|~((c @ X18 @ france)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_45, c_0_46])])). 0.21/0.51 thf(c_0_48, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34, c_0_47]), c_0_30])]), ['proof']). 0.21/0.51 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.21/0.51 # Parsed axioms : 98 0.21/0.51 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.21/0.51 # Initial clauses : 91 0.21/0.51 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 49 0.21/0.51 # Initial clauses in saturation : 42 0.21/0.51 # Processed clauses : 130 0.21/0.51 # ...of these trivial : 0 0.21/0.51 # ...subsumed : 0 0.21/0.51 # ...remaining for further processing : 130 0.21/0.51 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.21/0.51 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.21/0.51 # Backward-subsumed : 6 0.21/0.51 # Backward-rewritten : 17 0.21/0.51 # Generated clauses : 180 0.21/0.51 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 147 0.21/0.51 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.21/0.51 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 4 0.21/0.51 # Paramodulations : 180 0.21/0.51 # Factorizations : 0 0.21/0.51 # NegExts : 0 0.21/0.51 # Equation resolutions : 0 0.21/0.51 # Total rewrite steps : 49 0.21/0.51 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.21/0.51 # Propositional check models : 0 0.21/0.51 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.21/0.51 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.21/0.51 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.21/0.51 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.21/0.51 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.21/0.51 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.21/0.51 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.21/0.51 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.21/0.51 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.21/0.51 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.21/0.51 # Current number of processed clauses : 65 0.21/0.51 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 27 0.21/0.51 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.21/0.51 # Negative unit clauses : 2 0.21/0.51 # Non-unit-clauses : 36 0.21/0.51 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 95 0.21/0.51 # ...number of literals in the above : 318 0.21/0.51 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.21/0.51 # Current number of archived clauses : 65 0.21/0.51 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1097 0.21/0.51 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 658 0.21/0.51 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 7 0.21/0.51 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 77 0.21/0.51 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.21/0.51 # BW rewrite match attempts : 20 0.21/0.51 # BW rewrite match successes : 14 0.21/0.51 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.21/0.51 # Condensation successes : 0 0.21/0.51 # Termbank termtop insertions : 9421 0.21/0.51 0.21/0.51 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.21/0.51 # User time : 0.018 s 0.21/0.51 # System time : 0.006 s 0.21/0.51 # Total time : 0.024 s 0.21/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 2316 pages 0.21/0.51 0.21/0.51 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.21/0.51 # User time : 0.070 s 0.21/0.51 # System time : 0.018 s 0.21/0.51 # Total time : 0.088 s 0.21/0.51 # Maximum resident set size: 1828 pages 0.21/0.52 % E---3.1 exiting 0.21/0.52 EOF